What is it about addiction memoirs that the publishing industry finds so addictive? . . . →Read More:Memoirs of Addiction,Addiction to Memoirs
| |||||
What is it about addiction memoirs that the publishing industry finds so addictive? . . . →Read More:Memoirs of Addiction,Addiction to Memoirs Imagine Candace Bushnell writing a novel about the mating habits of the Vancouver Island marmot —no talent,no subject,no sale. . . . →Read More:I Put the Loser in Schmoozer Welcome to the All-New Bookfraud,where you’ll get more features,more posts,and more eyestrain than ever! A crappy new header,which I designed and made myself! Real links to real writers! One or two posts a year actually about books and writing! And,as promised,more exclamation points!!! After three years (!) of posting on Blogspot,yours truly decided that it was about time to get my own domain,and join the "adult"world of blogging (unfortunately,not the world of "adult blogging"). It is a world in which something called "Perez Hilton"gets 3,450 times more viewers in an hour than I do in a year,but no matter. Also,I thought owning a domain would be cool,and wanted to do some stuff I couldn’t on Blogspot. Maybe you like the new design,maybe you think it’s hideous. Would love to know your opinion. But first,let’s consider the new features,sans exclamation points: THIS WEEK IN LITERARY HISTORY:Notice the all-caps. Notice the lame joke. Basically,an outlet for my inner bad comic,mixed with my literary sensibility. If you think this is genuinely funny,then I’ll buy you a beer and make you laugh until you hurt. About 11 beers,that is. Feed the Beast:I still don’t know how all of the services work,and Technorati is like Greek,but every blog "expert"says I should have E-Z links to them. Why? Because I want to be more popular. Because I’m insecure. Because I’m a writer. In any case,if you can explain how Technorati works,and why I should link to it —and just how the hell to link to it – I’ll send you a picture of Baby. He’s really really really really cute. My BF Posts;Not Necessarily Yours:These are my favorite entries. They’re not necessarily the best or any good at all,for that matter. I stole this idea from another blog,though I can’t remember which one. Feel free to claim credit. Linx Pak:When I was in college,one of my favorite pastimes was riding over golf courses at midnight while listening to Black Flag’s "Six Pack"("Thirty-five dollars and a six-pack to my name! Six pack!"). This is a homage to those bright,happy days before my soul was crushed by the corporate grinder,ignorant book editors,even more ignorant literary journal editors,and the machine. I had resisted putting links together on the old incarnation of this blog,for reasons I can’t remember. I guess I just gave in this time. E-mail:That’s not new. Recent Posts:Not new,either. Top 12 Works of Fiction (This Week):This migrated over from Blogspot;it’s sorta,kinda new. It’s just some cool thing in which I,the learned expert,get to tell you,the reader,what you should be reading,because I am certainly correct in all things literary,though I can’t write a graduate-level English paper for shit. Recent Comments:Doesn’t serve any purpose,but it’s kinda cool. Spam Blocked:Why this number would interest anybody is a mystery to me,but to get the spam blocker you put the widget in the sidebar, . . . →Read More:All New Site,Same Old Shite I have just completed something that,for most people,would be a cause for celebration,or at least relief:I finished rewriting my novel,making it certifiable for resubmission. But I’m not like most people,and in this case,the difference is not for the better. For while I restructured and rewrote and re-everything,I came away cutting 30 pages. Only 30 pages. For a 380-page book,that’s less than 8 percent. That works out to about 1 percent a month. Wife,far wiser and pregnant than I shall ever be,noted quite correctly that size doesn’t always matter—even when less is more—and that 30 pages consigned to the dumpster,of itself,is not bad. But if the dumpster is not full,the author is then sure constipated still. My expectations were cut about 50 or more pages:a lean mean fiction machine. In rejecting the novel,almost all the editors said what held them back was that they’d lost interest by the end—the plot was too confusing,and while they dug the characterizations and writing,it wasn’t enough to ultimately win them over. (It is creepy to read letters that are about you but are addressed to someone else,in this case,my agent. You’re referred to in the third person — “Bookfraud left me a little cold”—as if you were a corpse being examined by medical examiners. ) I am missing the point,of course,which is if was the right 30 pages,I done well. Streamling is not my natural course of action:when in doubt,I’ll lard on characters,description,action,and exposition. A lean mean writing machine What is ironic about this was when I first sat down to write the novel,I feared that the premise was too vaporous upon which to build a book. Unconsciously,I went over the top in some places,as if filler would somehow confer “weightiness” to my labors. It’s always better to overwrite than underwrite,and if this was not a rationalization,it certainly gave me the thinnest of reasons to stack word upon word,building a tower that would surely fall if I were to remove a single sentence. So I came away with an unwieldy door-stopper,some 450 pages of this novel,of which,I’d gather,at least 200 pages were crap. I rewrote and rewrote,until I got it down to the 330-page,sorta-kinda-perhaps streamlined machine of fiction that resides on my hard drive. Mind you,I’m not expecting miracles. The book has been turned down about 20 times,and even though many of the rejection letters said the same thing,my agent was steadfast in insisting that I shouldn’t rewrite it. “It’s like giving Christmas gifts,” he said. “You have to find the right present for the right person.” Sears probably had fewer returns on Dec. 26. To make matters worse,I’ve been given advice from another agent,who told me,in so many words,that I’m fucked. He told me that agents hate taking previously rejected work,don’t want to look like they’re “stealing” clients,and don’t resend work to editors who have rejected books in the first place. Fair enough. But he told me directly that I should probably stick with my current agent,because nobody else is going to want to take me. . . . →Read More:Size Matters | |||||
| Copyright ©2012 - All Rights Reserved | |||||
That’s What You Said