THIS WEEK IN LITERARY HISTORY

Thomas Hardy gets wasted, sells his wife and child, and thinks, "This is an awesome idea for a novel."

Earworms

Carbon Dating

June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

The Death of the Dictionary

disney

My late father, bless him, was always trotting out not-so-subtle ways to improve the education of his children. We were voracious readers, and, as any reader knows, this means one is likely to come across an unfamiliar word, especially if said reader is 8 years old.

When I would ask my father for a definition — for "belie" or "derive," for instance — he would always say, "Son, I’m not sure, but I know someone who does — his name is Mr. Webster."

Thus informed, Dad and I would embark upon a 10-minute trudge through the dictionary. He would make me look up the word, pronounce it, read the definition, and, if he was in a particularly didactic mood, force me to use the word in a sentence. "’I belied reading the dictionary,’" I would say.

Though young, I was not stupid. I finally learned to ask my mother for definitions. Or I’d ask while we were in the car, Mr. Webster safely ensconced at home.

I thought of my father when I came across "Best Online Tools for Word Nerds." It claims the old-fashioned, paper dictionary is an artifact, as antiquated as rotary-dial phones and three-piece plaid leisure suits: "When you need a word’s definition, translation, pronunciation, synonym, or antonym, you don’t have to haul an enormous tome from the bookshelf, dust it off, and ruffle through its delicate pages like your grandparents used to do—you can just hop on the [I]nternet."

Though I would be lying if I said I didn’t use sites like dictionary.com with some frequency, the above reads like someone who hasn’t read a book in about four years, when he graduated college.

suburbs
OED: DOA?

But, as a writer of literary fiction, if you get rid of paper dictionaries, I might as well admit defeat and just write Smurf porn fan fiction. No, the fact that dictionary sales have plummeted does not mean that people are going to stop buying novels, especially the kind that features shoes and clothes like in "Sex in the City" (not to mention that features guys like Mr. Big, who apparently earned this nickname not through the immensity of his manhood but by his financial ability to effortlessly buy $25 million co-ops and transform them into temples of haute couture, if not a brothel).

What I’m saying is that you need serious readers for serious fiction — the kind of fiction that has words one must consult a dictionary to understand.

Now, if any of you are a word nerd as described above, you know that when you look up a single word in the dictionary, it can take 10 minutes — not because your father is forcing you to pronounce "langunious," but because you have spent that time in the endeavor of looking up other words. This is one of the rare pleasures of a dictionary that can be mimicked only by losing oneself in an encyclopedia (or, vast amounts of online p.o-r-n.). 

Admittedly, I’ve already foresaken the encyclopedia in favor of Google. Instead of looking up information that may or may not exist, I can immediately get an always-accurate datapoint via our friends at Wikipedia or elsewhere. Lots of people with bigger brains, larger vocabularies, and less bitterness have waxed eloquently on the demise of research vis a vis the Internet, and I won’t add my opinion here, because it’s really not worth the virtual page it’s written upon.

suburbs
Language takes a Pound-ing

But online dictionaries are like getting a prostitute versus nurturing a long relationship — one is faster, and you get something approximating pleasure, but the alternative, filled with missteps and hard work, is always far more rewarding. If people aren’t curious about words, they’re not going to care much about language, and le mot juste will remain an untranslated piece of pointless French.

The debasement of language can be directly traced to the decline of literary fiction and poetry (and conversely), and if people aren’t thumbing through their dictionaries, enjoying the langorous pleasures of new words, they rarely will give a damn whether or not your story is well-written or not.

Whew. I can feel my constipation clearing up already.

 

12 comments to The Death of the Dictionary

  • I also hate that you can’t browse through words as you consult an online dictionary. The word you are seeking just stands there naked, with none of its friends around. And you don’t learn new words in the process, words you never would have looked up. As a novice poet, I will sometimes go to my unabirdged Webster’s to look up words that start with specific letters or browse to find words that have the sounds I want. It’s a kind of free association process. Online dictionaries are cold, don’t offer up new words except for the goddamn word or the day. One word. It’s so condescending.

    Also, are you aware that when people comment on your blog, the right side of the comment box is covered by your right panel and is invisible, so I’m typing hoping I’m getting the words right over on the right, but have no idea because I am typing blindly.

  • I thought my dad was the only one who never knew what a word meant.

    I stand (well, sit, actually) corrected.

  • I’m sorry to say it’s been quite a while since I got lost in a dictionary.

  • Hi! Guilty on all counts of using the internet instead of the dictionary. Guess I need to dig it out of whatever dusty corner it inhabits and see what interesting words leap out at me.

  • I mostly use Google now, but every now and then I’ll pull out my massive American Heritage dictionary and look something up.

  • u should add encyclopedias too

  • Tai

    What a great dad you had. When my dad didn’t know the definition of a word, he’d just make one up: “Belie? Oh, that’s a type of mule-restraining device, common in Portugal in the 1800s.”

    I love my old, hardback Random House dictionary–although several times a day I also use the Oxford American on my Mac’s Dashboard. It’s diabolically convenient.

  • Dic…tion…ary? Is there a wiki entry for that? ;)

    Alas, I don’t use a real dictionary anymore but I do use a real thesaurus – I love my Roget’s; it’s always by my side when I write.

  • Right on. Nothing like curling up with a good reference book. I’m proud that my five-year-old daughter’s favorite bedtime “story” is a page or two from our full-color, glossy Atlas of the Universe. And my husband thought it was going to be HIS book when he bought it…

  • I trust my tattered Merriam-Webster more than the internet stuff.

  • I like your comment about serious fiction needing serious readers, people who aren’t afraid to look up words. I couldn’t agree more. I tried to think of writers who affect me this way and came up with a few, but not enough – especially not enough in the contemporary arena. And then I got even more annoyed when I realized I could only come up with male writers, so that gives me a lot to think about.

    I’m still saving up for a completed OED, magnifying glass and all – then I would really know how to spend my days!

  • I have something for all. wanna to go ………
    Online German dictionaries: dict.leo.org
    Korean dictionaries: [endic.naver.com] ; [kr.dic.yahoo.com]
    Chinese dictionaries: http://www.yellowbridge.com/chinese/chinese-dictionary.php ; [hk.dictionary.yahoo.com]

    I haven’t found any great online dictionaries for Spanish, French, etc. – suggestions, anyone?

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>