
In light of the hubub regarding same-sex marriage, not to mention the premier of the "Sex and the City" movie, it’s time to address one of the more pernicious linguistic constructions of the last few years: "gay."
No, I do not refer to its common use to mean "homosexual male." Or in the archaic useage of "happy" or a name. Instead, employing it as a pejorative adjective, as in, "That shirt is so gay" or "A capella singing is really gay" or "Watching the ‘Sex and the City’ movie is completely, totally, utterly gay."
It’s got to stop. I’ve been as guilty of it as the next person of saying it, but that doesn’t make it any less forgiveable.
I mean, when was the last time you heard someone say, "That bank is totally Jew," "Basketball is really Black," or "Immigrants are so Hispanic"? Probably not for 20 years, unless you spend your time at bars where the clientele arrives by swimming out of the toilet.
But when was the last time something or someone was called "gay"? Probably a few minutes ago.
Calling something "gay" is another way of calling it emasculated, stupid, and unworthy of one’s time. And by extension, that means that liking any cultural artifact associated with gays is, well, "gay."
Now, I have about as much real insight into gay culture as I do tribal Indonesian theater, but saying that there are some gay men who like to dress well, are active in musical theater, and like certain singer-divas is about as earth-shattering as saying that Imelda Marcos likes shoes.

But I like musicals
But here’s where my problem lies: I like nice clothes (despite my lousy wardrobe), musical theater, and Judy Garland (and Liza, too), and I’m not gay, or at least the last time I checked.
All these stereotypical "gay" things are good, just as most gays and lesbians are regular folk, so if someone "accuses" any thing, person, or trend as "gay," it actually is like saying that it’s good. To wit, a few years ago, a fellow member of tribe of Hebrews told me the perfect comeback when told that she "looked" Jewish: "Thank you."
This is perfect because it addresses two things at once: to say someone looks Jewish is ridiculous, and even if it were true, there’s nothing wrong with it. Sure, the offender may be referring to the size of one’s proboscis, the texture of one’s hair, or how one dresses (i.e. the size of the wallet), but why should it be an insult to be associated with being a member of the oldest religious club out there?
In fact, though you are certain to be branded an anti-Semite if you were to say I "looked Jewish" to my face, for although I am not insulted to look a certain way, it means you are engaging in stereotype: there are African Jews, Asian Jews, Arab Jews, and Jews of other ethnicities, not all that begin with the letter "A."
Now, I don’t know how other persecuted minorities feel about it, but if there’s something that makes me unconfortable, it’s when something is too "Jew-y," a direct reflection of not only my own self-loathing but the desire to assimilate — I have known people who are truly astounded that Jews love wine, women and song, of which ignorance of the last is akin to saying, "Damn — I didn’t know there were Jews in show business."

But not mine
So, starting soon, I will make periodic posts about "gay" things I like — akin to the uber-popular "Stuff White People Like." Hell, if that can generate a book deal with a $300,000 advance, maybe I could string it out.
Which would be super, duper gay.
Addendum: Superblogger Voix has noted that the citizens of the Isle of Lesbos are trying to stop use of "lesbian" to mean "lesbian." This is just so wrong that I can’t begin to imagine the implications if they prevail.







