Comments on: Liberal Media Bias Exposed! And Explained http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/ At least 65 percent not depressing. Tue, 15 May 2012 03:32:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bookfraud http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2768 bookfraud Thu, 11 May 2006 08:10:59 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-2768 mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that's been my experience, at least, and i've met a lot of the bastards. and i've never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment. doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas. mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that’s been my experience, at least, and i’ve met a lot of the bastards. and i’ve never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment.

doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas.

]]> By: bookfraud http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-4569 bookfraud Thu, 11 May 2006 08:10:59 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-4569 mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that's been my experience, at least, and i've met a lot of the bastards. and i've never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment. doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas. mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that’s been my experience, at least, and i’ve met a lot of the bastards. and i’ve never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment.

doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas.

]]> By: bookfraud http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-977 bookfraud Thu, 11 May 2006 03:10:59 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-977 mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that's been my experience, at least, and i've met a lot of the bastards. and i've never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment. doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas. mark a york: i would agree that when it comes to media as institutions, it is not liberal, but i do think most journalists, in their personal beliefs, lean towards the left. that’s been my experience, at least, and i’ve met a lot of the bastards. and i’ve never had my own politics vetted as a condition of employment.

doubleb: true liberalism in the classic sense? i would say that adherence to dogma is what gets us in trouble, not conservative or liberal ideas.

]]> By: Doublebagger http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2767 Doublebagger Tue, 09 May 2006 11:41:43 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-2767 I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because "guns are evil" when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It's the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too. I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because “guns are evil” when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It’s the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too.

]]> By: Doublebagger http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-4568 Doublebagger Tue, 09 May 2006 11:41:43 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-4568 I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because "guns are evil" when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It's the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too. I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because “guns are evil” when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It’s the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too.

]]> By: Doublebagger http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Doublebagger Tue, 09 May 2006 06:41:43 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-976 I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because "guns are evil" when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It's the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too. I just wonder how far true liberalism is from socialism and communism. Basically most liberals are for disarming the general public because “guns are evil” when a gun is only a chunk of metal. It’s the person who uses it for an illegal purpose that is evil. Not the gun. That is how most of the media portrays it too.

]]> By: Mark A. York http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2766 Mark A. York Tue, 09 May 2006 06:11:46 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-2766 This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don't know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That's an opinion. As a guy trying to market that j-degree it's as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can't get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn't they want me by default? It ain't real. It's a myth. This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don’t know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That’s an opinion.

As a guy trying to market that j-degree it’s as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can’t get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn’t they want me by default? It ain’t real. It’s a myth.

]]> By: Mark A. York http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-4567 Mark A. York Tue, 09 May 2006 06:11:46 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-4567 This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don't know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That's an opinion. As a guy trying to market that j-degree it's as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can't get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn't they want me by default? It ain't real. It's a myth. This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don’t know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That’s an opinion.

As a guy trying to market that j-degree it’s as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can’t get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn’t they want me by default? It ain’t real. It’s a myth.

]]> By: Mark A. York http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-975 Mark A. York Tue, 09 May 2006 01:11:46 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-975 This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don't know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That's an opinion. As a guy trying to market that j-degree it's as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can't get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn't they want me by default? It ain't real. It's a myth. This is a conservative myth. Every time someone claims this and is asked for proof we get things like numbers of opinion columnists, countered by conservative owners of so-called liberal papers. What it means is most don’t know the op-ed page from the news. Show me a biased news story? They never can. Voting means nothing. Many journalists dont even vote and are apolitical. Rush is a fool and anyone who agrees goes down that yellow brick road with him. That’s an opinion.

As a guy trying to market that j-degree it’s as dismal as you say, only up the pay to $10 an hour. They pay dishwashers that much. Moreover as a liberal blogger I can’t get hired as a reporter so far. If they were all liberal wouldn’t they want me by default? It ain’t real. It’s a myth.

]]> By: bookfraud http://bookfraud.com/2006/05/05/liberal-media-bias-exposed-and-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-2765 bookfraud Mon, 08 May 2006 22:36:08 +0000 http://bookfraud.com/?p=92#comment-2765 kero: the press was intimidated by 9/11, and anyone who dared investigate bush's world was branded a traitor. i also think that they've given bush a pass because of a)they don't want to be labeled "liberal" and b)they gave him a long leash after 9/11. but now i think the gloves are off, indicated by the white house's eagerness to jail journalists. madamed: i hope you're not trying to tell us something. kero: the press was intimidated by 9/11, and anyone who dared investigate bush’s world was branded a traitor. i also think that they’ve given bush a pass because of a)they don’t want to be labeled “liberal” and b)they gave him a long leash after 9/11. but now i think the gloves are off, indicated by the white house’s eagerness to jail journalists.

madamed: i hope you’re not trying to tell us something.

]]>